Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation
Working for peace, social
justice and principled nonviolence since 1976
Home |
Contact Us | Donate or
Volunteer
~ Glen
Anderson
Essay #3 in the
“Building an Effective Peace Movement” series:
This is the
third of a series of articles exploring various ways the peace
movement can strengthen itself and become more effective.
These articles recognize that:
(1) The way to win peace and social justice
is through grassroots organizing to build an ever-larger movement of the
general public;
(2) To win public opinion, nonviolence is
both necessary and powerful;
(3) We need to strategize carefully to build
this movement through a variety of smart campaigns and activities;
and (4) Details that might seem small can
mean the difference between success and failure.
Articles are
posted
on the Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation’s website,
www.olyfor.org
In every aspect of our society – foreign policy,
domestic policy, economics, environment, human rights, global climate
disruption, peak oil, electoral processes – even democracy itself – our
society is in a severe crisis.
We’d
be in even worse crisis if the peace & justice & nonviolence movements had
not been working hard over the decades to prevent and solve the problems
that confront us now.
Public opinion polls show that most Americans
think our country is headed in the wrong direction:
·
People want peace but
are frustrated that Bush and Congress just keep giving us more war.
·
People worry about a
variety of environmental and climate problems.
·
People fear that we’re
headed for an economic collapse.
·
People know that big
corporations and an arrogant federal government are undermining democracy.
The list is endless.
What serious crises would you add?
How much of the general public
carries these fears below the level of conscious awareness?
How much of the public is in denial about how
serious these problems are?
How many people feel powerless to solve these
problems?
An old saying asserts that “power corrupts,” but
we must also recognize that powerlessness is even more corrosive,
because people who feel powerless lose the ability to act – and lose the
ability to solve the problems confronting them.
Learned Helplessness:
Psychologist Martin Seligman was
experimenting with conditioning dogs and got unexpected results.
He placed a dog in a box with side-by-side
compartments divided by a low wall.
When he ran an electric shock through the floor
on one side, the dog jumped to other side.
Then he ran the electricity again, but this time
with the dog restrained by a harness that prevented it from jumping over the
low dividing wall.
After doing this for a while Dr. Seligman
removed the harness and shocked the dog again, but now the dog would
not jump to other side.
The dog just cowered in the corner.
The dog had learned to become helpless.
This can happen to us.
Terrible things happen in the world (wars, injustices, environmental
catastrophes, massive layoffs, etc.), but the governments and other powerful
entities allow them to continue.
When people try to solve the problems, the
governments and other powerful entities stifle our attempts to solve them.
Repeated
shocks to us with no way to escape the problems train us to become helpless
– to cower in the corner – to become cynical about democracy – to stop
trying – to become clinically depressed – to become passive consumers and TV
viewers.
These fatalistic responses make it easier for
oppressors to grab more power and oppress us further.
People have discovered that Bush,
Cheney, Karl Rove, and others have deliberately tried to make people feel
afraid and powerless.
Public feelings of powerlessness have allowed
manipulative politicians to do whatever they want because the public felt
too powerless to stop them.
At the end of the experiment, Martin
Seligman had to actually train the dog how to escape the shocks.
Likewise, we need train the public – and our
fellow political activists – that we
do have power to counteract the political repression.
We need to help the public discover and understand
how to empower ourselves and how to devise smart, nonviolent strategies so
we can turn things around.
This might be a long and difficult
struggle – perhaps requiring great sacrifices.
Many people who want peace and other progressive
political goals have become discouraged and have stopped believing that
success is possible.
As a result, some parts of the peace and
progressive movements now exude pessimism and cynicism.
Who would want to join a movement so glum,
depressed and pessimistic?
No wonder the peace and progressive movements
are not growing as rapidly as we should.
Some activists are shooting ourselves in the
feet with pessimism and cynicism – or with antagonistic tactics that “turn
off” the very public we need to reach.
Reject Fear and Despair.
Fear is closer to the bottom of
animal instincts rather than a higher-level cognitive or spiritual quality.
Fear demands simplistic responses to complex
situations.
Make a conscious choice to
reject living in fear.
All of the forces that seek to
dominate us try to provoke and manipulate fear – fear of communism, fear of
terrorists, fear of foreigners, fear of criminals, fear of poverty, fear of
losing our jobs, fear of racial minorities, fear of young people, fear of
unconventional ideas, fear of being different, fear of being out of style,
and fear of our own inner wisdom.
They want us to be afraid so we will be easy to
manipulate – to
support a huge military, to give up our civil liberties, to help the
powerful suppress the powerless, to let industries destroy our environment,
to be obedient employees, to be mindless consumers, to stop asking the
serious questions, to stop making waves.
And on and on.
People who are afraid are more
likely to do what the authorities tell them to do.
Rejecting
fear is a revolutionary act.
Rejecting fear is a big step toward liberation.
When we were little kids, most of us
were taught, “Don’t talk to strangers.”
This is what causes people to be afraid of
homeless people downtown.
One of the Olympia FOR’s peace vigil signs
boldly urges, “Talk with strangers.”
Another sign says, “Make friends across races,
religions, nationalities, ...”
If more Americans had Arab friends,
Muslim friends, Iraqi friends, and Palestinian friends, we would not have
the foreign policy we do now.
During the 1980s people-to-people exchanges
between Americans and Russians helped to end the Cold War without animosity
toward the Russian people.
If during the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s,
more Americans had close friendships with people in Vietnam, we would not
have killed two million Vietnamese people and destroyed their environment
during that war.
To help the two journalists
investigate Watergate, Deep Throat advised them to “Follow the money.”
In our case, the peace and progressive movements
should “Follow the fear.”
Who is promoting fear?
What fears are they promoting?
How could we put those fears in perspective and
counteract them?
What positive messages could we substitute?
A lot of people feel powerless
already, even if they don’t use that term, and even if they don’t
consciously recognize their feelings of powerlessness.
We can help them understand why – and point to
the actual political and economic reasons for their feelings of
powerlessness.
But we must be sensitive to their feelings, or
else we’ll push them away.
Do we really think we can turn
things around , or do we just go through the motions with a defeatist
attitude in the backs of our minds?
Sometimes the peace movement seems to exude
pessimism – as if we really don’t believe we can succeed.
Some elements of the movement lash out at the
general public with anger and contempt.
When we speak disparagingly of the middle class
and the mainstream public, we push away the very people we need to recruit
as allies in the movement.
Who would want to join a movement that is angry, glum, pessimistic and
depressed?
We can’t afford such negativity!
We have a choice!
Our future is teetering and could tip either
way.
The choice is up
to us.
During the
1980s the risk of nuclear war was very high.
Often someone would ask me whether we thought
we’d destroy the planet or whether we’d figure out a way to survive.
I always responded by asking the questioner,
“What do you think?”
My question for the questioner would produce a
self-fulfilling prophecy.
If that person said we were doomed, then we
would be doomed, because a
hopeless person does not take smart and effective action.
But if that person said we’d stop the nuclear
arms, then I knew we would be
able to survive, because a person committed to solving a problem creates
hope and opportunities.
This is our situation now regarding our foreign
policy, the global climate crisis, Bush’s steps toward dictatorship, and the
other big problems facing us.
You
decide!
Whatever
you decide will become the next reality.
The good changes in society and politics come
only from the bottom up!
Consider these two systems.
One occurs commonly.
The other is an effective alternative:
·
System #1:
Violence causes fear, which causes the fearful
person to retaliate violently.
Current examples include Israel & Palestine, the
US & “Islamic terrorists,” and Olympia’s discomfort with homeless people
leading to more repression of poor people and a wider gap between “us” and
“them.”
This cycle of violence becomes a self-fulfilling
prophecy, and the problem gets worse.
·
System #2:
Violence and fear are recognized as revealing
gaps that exist between groups of people.
We sense that the remedy for healing these gaps
would be to generate more compassion and understanding in order to bridge
the gaps.
This cycle too would become a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the problem
gets solved.
How can we start to connect with
people?
We typically start by throwing a lot of facts at
people.
But many people are not yet ready to hear and absorb
facts.
Perhaps we’d find people more able
to deal with the hard realities if we were to begin by asking them what they
feel about the world situation.
We might acknowledge our own worry about some
issues and ask whether they worry about them too.
After they feel OK about acknowledging their
fears, frustrations, despair or other feelings, perhaps they’ll be better
able to hear and absorb facts – and join us in working to solve the
problems.
Conclusion
Our community, nation and world do
face serious problems.
Everybody knows that.
Nonviolence does not sugarcoat the
problems that exist.
The theory and practice of nonviolence do give
us some grounding, some confidence, and some methods for dealing with the
problems effectively.
First steps must include understanding the
problems and rejecting the feelings of fear, powerlessness and despair that
paralyze our society.
So rather than begin by assuming
that people are apathetic and just don’t care, let’s assume that people are
feeling pain for the world’s problems.
Our job is to help people become aware of their
feelings, to graciously allow them to express their feelings, and to help
them empower themselves to act constructively – even in small ways – toward
solving the problems.
Throughout this process, we need to treat the
other person with compassion rather than in a self-righteous or elitist way.
Each of us learns from the other.
Nonviolent action has a tremendous track record of
success, as the next installment of this series will show.
For more information, resources and
workshops
on effective grassroots organizing –
contact
the Olympia Fellowship of
Reconciliation at
(360) 491-9093
info@olyfor.org
www.olyfor.org